Mira’s colour table

The label belongs to the colour.

The first samples in my tin had beautiful colours and almost no useful information. I remembered which afternoon I made them, but not which piece of cloth went into which bath. A yellow square might have been cotton or a blend. By the following month, even my confident memories had begun disagreeing with one another.

Five swatch families, drawn as geometry. Real cloth has its own variations in light and texture.
Five swatch families, drawn as geometry. Real cloth has its own variations in light and texture.

A journal entry about the record itself

Now I write a label before starting. It names the fabric as accurately as I can, records the date, and leaves room for preparation and timing notes. I give each experiment an ordinary descriptive name, such as “warm yellow, second attempt.” A simple name is easier to remember than a complicated numbering system that I am unlikely to maintain.

I compare samples only after they have dried fully. I lay them by the window with a piece of untreated cloth beside them, then look again in the evening. Light changes the story. When I photograph a sample for my own reference, I keep the written description too; the picture rarely reproduces exactly what is on the table.

The swatches shown here are a graphic interpretation of the tin’s warm and cool families, rather than a promise of reproducible dye colours. Actual results depend on materials and conditions. My most useful discovery has been much simpler than a formula: a disappointing result with a clear label can teach me more than a lovely square with no history.